Skip to main content

A Review of “Last Night in Soho (2021)”

 

image

Edgar Wright is one of my favourite directors working right now. His work on the Cornetto trilogy, Scott Pilgrim and Baby Driver was amazing. When he revealed his next work to be a horror movie, I was super interested. The premise is “An aspiring fashion designer is mysteriously able to enter the 1960s, where she encounters a dazzling wannabe singer. However, the glamour is not all it appears to be, and the dreams of the past start to crack and splinter into something far darker”. So is this another home run by Edgar or a truly forgettable night in Soho?

image

One thing I appreciate about this movie is just how unique Last Night in Soho is. Edgar Wright conjured a horror movie like no other. Edgar blends a mix of mystery and psychological horror in a wonderful way that just works. The mystery aspect is the most central element in the plot. Trying to figure out what is going on with our main character and what happened in the 1960s is what keeps the story interesting. Throughout the film, I was trying to piece everything just like our main lead and I love that! Psychological horror is the second element and it is handled fascinatingly. There is the ghost stuff which is typical horror movie stuff but the real horror is the things that happened underneath the surface, which I won’t spoil. It’s not a topic that I would expect Edgar to explore but he handled it in a tasteful way that works for the movie. What he explored feels believable, in that you could see it happening in the real life. It’s quite scary to believe that but that is what makes the film great.

image

Additionally, I love the contrast in production design and cinematography between the modern-day and the 1960s. The cinematography and sets are very grey, brown and slightly washed out in colour in the modern-day. When it changes to the 1960s, it then becomes incredibly vibrant and colourful even during the darker stuff. The costume designs are also wonderful in showing this contrast as well with the wonderfully elegant 1960s clothes feeling very authentic. Edgar Wright is also still able to give some great camera shots. One memorable sequence is a dance scene where the girl keeps changing between Eloise of present-day and Sandie of the 1960s. On that note, all the actors do a great job, even those with small screen time such as Terence Stamp and Diana Rigg (who sadly passed away). Anna Taylor Joy gives a performance, unlike anything she has done before as Sandie. However, she ain’t the main lead as that responsibility goes to Thomasin McKenzie who does a phenomenal job. She is able to convey the fact that her character, Eloise, was losing her mind and it was a sight to see her go from sweet and loving to an almost full-on panic attack.   

image

I mentioned it before but the film utilises Ghost in the plot as a way to give scares but it doesn’t really work. It is very clear this is Edgar’s first attempt at the horror as the Ghost just kind of appear in the full body which reduces any impact of a scare from them. He also starts to use them a bit too much that it gets to the point that I just kind of felt numb to their appearance. It gets especially noticeable in the second half where build-up and tension just get tossed out for another event of “ghost appearing time!”. On that note, in terms of writing the second half becomes a very B movie and campy. It’s not as strong as the first half and gets to a point where it feels very silly. There are also some cool reveals but they don’t get executed in a very satisfying manner.

image

Overall, this is a great first attempt at horror from Edgar Wright. Although, some would argue that this is more of a mystery than horror as it ain’t downright scary. Nevertheless, I had an enjoyable experience watching this film and I’m glad that Edgar did something more original in a genre that is losing a lot of steam. Edgar film is one memorable night in Soho and I can’t wait to see what Edgar does next.


 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A “QUICK!” Review of “Boy Kills World (2024)”

  Bill Skarsgard in an action movie? Yes Please! The story is a generic revenge flick with an interesting concept of a mute and deaf protagonist. The main character has an inner voice which is voiced by H. Jon Benjamin of Archer and Bob’s Burger fame. This sounds interesting on paper but the problem is that the lines are so obnoxious and there are too many. It is always some kind of stupid quip or stating an obvious. It has a lot of comedy but most didn’t land for me. However, you are here for the action and it delivers on those. It has a lot of gore, gunplay, martial arts and over-the-top set pieces. It really shines in the 3rd act in both the story and the action. The final fight is a top-tier choreographed fight. In the end, Boy Kills World knows what it is and gives you exactly that. A bloody, fun action comedy!    
Post a Comment
Read more

A “QUICK!” Review of “Badland Hunters (2024)“

  Ma Dong-Seok is one of the coolest dudes in Korean cinema. I do think the film is a little disappointing as the post-apocalyptic setting isn’t used in an exciting way. The plot is also nothing special. It is incredibly dumb and predictable while also having minimal explanation about anything. The characters are also very bland. There is barely any exploration of any of the characters including the main character. Due to this, they all come off as one-dimensional and this makes it very difficult to care about anyone. However, it has some incredibly well-choreographed and fun action sequences. Who doesn’t want to see Ma Dong-seok kick ass!
Post a Comment
Read more

A “QUICK!” Review of “Monkey Man (2024)”

  Dev Patel is an actor I admire so of course I was interested in his directorial debut. There is a lot of great stuff here but there are some issues too. The first act has a great build-up with its sprinkle of backstory and world of crime. The action scene is fun albeit it is overly edited and has a lot of shaky cams. The movie’s pacing then goes to a complete stall with its boring second act that goes on for too long. Nothing of importance occurs apart from explaining something the audience already knows and a pointless side quest. The final act is a full-on action set piece that doesn’t use shaky cam but is incredibly predictable. Monkey Man has an interesting spin with the added Indian mythology but it is just an overstuffed and over-explained revenge story. It is a great start for Dev Patel and I will look at his director career with great interest.
Post a Comment
Read more