Skip to main content

A Review of “Extraction 2 (2023)”

 

image

I loved Chris Hemsworth in Extraction (2020). Getting to see him outside of Marvel in a fun action movie, was enjoyable. However, it was a very flawed movie that felt lacking compared to something like ‘John Wick’. Still, I saw potential in a sequel so I was not surprised when Extraction 2 was announced. Does this improve on its predecessor or continue to have the same problems?

image

Let’s start with why people are watching this: the action. The action scenes are still a blast to watch! The violent and brutal fist fights with the swift gunplay are all incredibly well choreographed. The sequel also tops the first movie’s one-shot action sequence by being 21 minutes. It isn’t just longer though, it is well-connected and more awesome as well. The prison sequence is phenomenal with how tense it is and how our main character punches his way out. Chris Hemsworth continues to be charismatic and charming as our main character: Tyler Rake. Chris does a lot of his own stunts and it clearly shows in the excellent action scenes. He also gets to do more emotional moments as well making his character a little more interesting. Golshifteh Farahani returns as Nik, a mercenary ally of Tyler, and she gets a lot more to do this time. She has her fight scenes that are great to watch as well. 

image

One element that is improved is Tyler Rake having more characterization. We barely knew or cared about him in the first movie but this time we get to know more about him through his past and interactions with others. It also helps that this mission feels more meaningful to his character as he is having to “Extract” someone more connected to him. His friendship with Nik is also explored a bit more. It feels like there is more of a stake this time which makes me care more about what is going on in the story. The villain is also more threatening this time with him physically hunting down our characters and actually fighting our main character.

image

However, this movie doesn’t improve upon everything. The plot is still predictable and bare bone as the first movie was. Nothing interesting occurs whatsoever in the plot; it hits all the cliché beats you would expect. There is also some shaky cam in some of the sequences which is a little distracting when it mostly maintains a clean stable shot during the action. Some of the action scenes can feel a bit questionable as well. For example, the main character stands completely still but the enemy misses or the main character not taking proper cover while being shot at. There is also a fair amount of bad CGI such as the helicopters which is very noticeable. One thing Chris got to do in Extraction 1 was punch a kid. Unfortunately, he does not do that in the second film but there is definitely a kid that deserved a punch from him.

image

Overall, this is a big improvement. I enjoyed this sequel a lot and if the next entry continues to improve even further, then I am 100% watching the 3rd one. Hopefully, he gets to punch a kid again though.


 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A “QUICK!” Review of “Boy Kills World (2024)”

  Bill Skarsgard in an action movie? Yes Please! The story is a generic revenge flick with an interesting concept of a mute and deaf protagonist. The main character has an inner voice which is voiced by H. Jon Benjamin of Archer and Bob’s Burger fame. This sounds interesting on paper but the problem is that the lines are so obnoxious and there are too many. It is always some kind of stupid quip or stating an obvious. It has a lot of comedy but most didn’t land for me. However, you are here for the action and it delivers on those. It has a lot of gore, gunplay, martial arts and over-the-top set pieces. It really shines in the 3rd act in both the story and the action. The final fight is a top-tier choreographed fight. In the end, Boy Kills World knows what it is and gives you exactly that. A bloody, fun action comedy!    
Post a Comment
Read more

A “QUICK!” Review of “Badland Hunters (2024)“

  Ma Dong-Seok is one of the coolest dudes in Korean cinema. I do think the film is a little disappointing as the post-apocalyptic setting isn’t used in an exciting way. The plot is also nothing special. It is incredibly dumb and predictable while also having minimal explanation about anything. The characters are also very bland. There is barely any exploration of any of the characters including the main character. Due to this, they all come off as one-dimensional and this makes it very difficult to care about anyone. However, it has some incredibly well-choreographed and fun action sequences. Who doesn’t want to see Ma Dong-seok kick ass!
Post a Comment
Read more

A “QUICK!” Review of “Twilight of the Warriors: Walled In (2024)”

  When I found out after watching, that this was based on a Manhua (Chinese Comic book), it started to make sense. Characters that feel straightforward, the action scenes that defy physics in every way, the power of friendship, straight-up superpowered abilities, and countless flashbacks. The film suffers from juggling too many things. We have this fish out of water, self-discovery story with our main character. We have this gang conflict between those in the Walled City and the Triads. We have a revenge plot. We have a man dealing with his past—the growing of bonds. Unfortunately, the story is all incredibly predictable and lacks real depth. The constant talk about the past conflict sounded more interesting than the main plot. The ending is lacklustre and the final fight is so weird with the unexplained superpowers. However, if you like martial arts movies then there is certainly fun to be had here.
Post a Comment
Read more