Skip to main content

A Review of “Mickey 17 (2025)”

 

image

Five years after winning Best Picture for Parasite, Bong Joon-ho returns with Mickey 17. The big question is: does this live up to his previous work, or is it a disappointing step down?

image

What initially drew me to this movie was its intriguing concept. The idea of a person whose sole job is to die repeatedly for the sake of humanity—thanks to cloning technology—is both fascinating and disturbing. For the most part, the film explores the political, religious, and ethical dilemmas that would arise if such technology existed. Bong Joon-ho uses this premise to craft a sharp satire on American politics while exploring deeper themes about identity and what makes us truly human. The writing is strong, filled with clever comedic moments, subtle jabs, and a genuine message. At its core, Mickey 17 also functions as a quiet coming-of-age story for its protagonist, leading to a satisfying and well-earned conclusion.

image


Visually, the film is stunning. The production design—from the sets to the costumes and even the CGI—is impressive. The ship’s muted colors and claustrophobic layout reinforce Mickey’s status as a disposable worker, making his existence feel suffocating. This contrasts beautifully with the planet Niflheim, which is bright and open, creating a striking visual juxtaposition. The alien designs are both grotesque and strangely adorable, a testament to Bong’s ability to balance the bizarre with the endearing.

image

Robert Pattinson delivers a phenomenal performance as both Mickey 17 and Mickey 18, giving each iteration a distinct personality. His chemistry with himself is oddly compelling, and he also shares strong on-screen moments with Naomi Ackie, who plays his love interest. Mark Ruffalo and Toni Collette are a delight as the film’s over-the-top, egomaniacal antagonists, fully embracing the darkly comedic tone.

image

That said, their performances might be divisive. Ruffalo and Collette lean into cartoonish villainy, which contrasts with the relatively restrained performances of the rest of the cast. Given the film’s dark comedic edge, I think it works, but some viewers may find it jarring. Additionally, supporting characters played by Steven Yeun and Anamaria Vartolomei are saddled with underdeveloped subplots that feel tacked on rather than essential. Vartolomei’s character, in particular, seems to be heading toward a revenge arc that never fully materializes, and both their storylines are wrapped up in an unsatisfying manner.

image


If I had any nitpicks, I wish we had seen more of Mickey’s past deaths, considering he’s died 16 times before the film’s events. The movie establishes that each clone has a slightly different personality, but rather than showing this, it’s mostly told to us. There’s also an expository scene explaining why having multiple clones is forbidden, featuring a backstory so compelling that I almost wished that were the film instead.

image


Overall, Mickey 17 is a fun and thought-provoking addition to the sci-fi genre. While it doesn’t fully capitalize on its ambitious concept, the story it tells remains engaging and entertaining. It works as both a popcorn flick and a film with meaningful themes. Plus, Robert Pattinson doing another funny accent is always worth the price of admission.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A “QUICK!” Review of “Boy Kills World (2024)”

  Bill Skarsgard in an action movie? Yes Please! The story is a generic revenge flick with an interesting concept of a mute and deaf protagonist. The main character has an inner voice which is voiced by H. Jon Benjamin of Archer and Bob’s Burger fame. This sounds interesting on paper but the problem is that the lines are so obnoxious and there are too many. It is always some kind of stupid quip or stating an obvious. It has a lot of comedy but most didn’t land for me. However, you are here for the action and it delivers on those. It has a lot of gore, gunplay, martial arts and over-the-top set pieces. It really shines in the 3rd act in both the story and the action. The final fight is a top-tier choreographed fight. In the end, Boy Kills World knows what it is and gives you exactly that. A bloody, fun action comedy!    

A “QUICK!” Review of “Twilight of the Warriors: Walled In (2024)”

  When I found out after watching, that this was based on a Manhua (Chinese Comic book), it started to make sense. Characters that feel straightforward, the action scenes that defy physics in every way, the power of friendship, straight-up superpowered abilities, and countless flashbacks. The film suffers from juggling too many things. We have this fish out of water, self-discovery story with our main character. We have this gang conflict between those in the Walled City and the Triads. We have a revenge plot. We have a man dealing with his past—the growing of bonds. Unfortunately, the story is all incredibly predictable and lacks real depth. The constant talk about the past conflict sounded more interesting than the main plot. The ending is lacklustre and the final fight is so weird with the unexplained superpowers. However, if you like martial arts movies then there is certainly fun to be had here.

A “QUICK!” Review of “Rebel Ridge (2024)”

  Netflix marketed Rebel Ridge as a cool action movie. If you came in expecting that, you are going to be disappointed. Rebel Ridge is not an action movie. It has just one proper action set piece near the end. What Rebel Ridge really is, is a slow-burn thriller mystery. Aaron Pierre absolutely delivers as the main lead. He is calm, collected and incredibly charismatic. He totally sells on a character that is secretly a badass. I like the twist in that the character doesn’t kill, even if they are corrupt cops. This gives the very few action set pieces a unique element to it. The mystery itself is a little convoluted and the movie does go on for 10-15 minutes too long. The ending is quite rushed and unsatisfying as well. Still, this is a pretty interesting film and I do recommend people give it a chance.